Timeline for Showing total progress in rsync: is it possible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2018 at 20:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 1, 2018 at 4:20 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2017 at 4:24 | comment | added | Abhi Beckert | For my "long transfers" a du operation takes about an hour to complete, during which rsync is running much slower, because they're fighting over access to the disk. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 10:47 | comment | added | Nobody | I don't know what kind of long transfers you do, where du is viable. du is slow as hell when the result will be in TB and M of files. | |
| Jul 21, 2015 at 1:44 | comment | added | Nathan Basanese | // , Clever! According to linfo.org: "The du (i.e., disk usage) command reports the sizes of directory trees inclusive of all of their contents and the sizes of individual files. This makes it useful for tracking down space hogs, i.e., directories and files that consume large or excessive amounts of space on a hard disk drive (HDD) or other storage media." | |
| S Jan 16, 2013 at 10:23 | history | edited | dunxd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling: wach -> watch && more info about watch
|
| S Jan 16, 2013 at 10:23 | history | suggested | max | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling: wach -> watch && more info about watch
|
| Jan 16, 2013 at 10:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 16, 2013 at 10:23 | |||||
| Nov 16, 2012 at 2:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Nov 16, 2012 at 2:22 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2011 at 16:30 | history | answered | funollet | CC BY-SA 2.5 |