Timeline for Safe way to authenticate (multi-factor authentication?) while being monitored?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 12, 2012 at 0:22 | answer | added | fiasco_averted | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 20:33 | vote | accept | Isaac | ||
| Aug 15, 2011 at 18:48 | comment | added | this.josh | What services are you trying to authenticate with? The obvious advice here is to not authenticate with any service that hold substantial value for you. It also seems like in the threat model there signifficant latency between the time your information is recorded and the time at which it might be used. In that case simply make your password update cycle slightly shorter than the minimum time between data recording and data use. i.e. If your data is recorded on Monday and the earliest an attacker could use the information is Thursday, then update your passwords on Wednesday. | |
| Aug 15, 2011 at 4:22 | answer | added | Steve Dispensa | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 15, 2011 at 3:49 | answer | added | D.W. | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14, 2011 at 22:47 | answer | added | user2213 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14, 2011 at 22:27 | answer | added | Douglas Leeder | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14, 2011 at 22:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/102868119537725440 | ||
| Aug 14, 2011 at 21:32 | history | asked | Isaac | CC BY-SA 3.0 |