I believe Plasma is possibly fundamentally asking:
"Aren't all 'robots' shaped like humans - otherwise you would not call it a robot? You can only call it a 'robot' if it's human-shaped, right?"
IF that is what you are asking, Plasma, the answer is simply no, that is definitely not the case. Today in the real world, and in all sci-fi settings I know of, "robot" very much means "any robot". NOT only robots which are "shaped like a human". Indeed, if I'm not mistaken, the most common existing robot today is the Roomba,
and the most advanced robots today are certainly assembly industrial robots
These all look nothing like a human. Indeed, there are very few robots (the total number might be "20" or something) that are humanoid, such as Honda's "Asimo"...
If your additional question is about the word "Droid", in short that is simply an invention of George Lucas (although, sure, it may have been used earlier in certain obscure books: it's almost impossible to be the absolutely first person to author a word).
Now, it seems that in Star Wars, the word "droid" is used exactly as we use the real word robot. That is to say, "droid" in Star Wars means "all robots"
And indeed, it seems that by far most "droids" (ie, "robots") in Star Wars (just like in the real world) are NOT particularly humanoid.
If you're wondering where the term "Android" comes from, it has been in use since the 1800s. "Droid" would seem to be an invention by Lucas based on "Android".
HOWEVER.......
IT IS TRUE THAT since in our real world, "Android" tends to mean exactly "a robot that IS INDEED human-shaped", it's perhaps somewhat confusing that "droid" seems to be the Star Wars word for "any robot of any shape".
"robot" in the real world: ANY shape of robot
"android" in the real world: ONLY humanoid robots. (it's worth noting that these of course barely exist yet, there are only 2 or 3 of them and they can barely walk)
"droid" in the Star Wars universe. I believe this is exactly equivalent to what we call "robot", ie ANY shape of robot
"robot" in the Star Wars universe. I believe this word is not used in the Star Wars universe.
Two relevant points,
3.a. I'd say that in the Star Wars universe, all robots (droids) are mobile, whether tiny or large they generally can move around (often with different humorous modes of locomotion, in contrast to humanoid shapes). Of course, here in the real world of 2015, there are almost no moving robots (only the Roomba and a few military robots that move on tank tracks), numerically basically all real robots of today (setting aside Roomba) are fixed in place.
3.b. Many have intelligently pointed out on this page that R2D2 is perfectly human-like. He's a totally normal "person", with absolutely normal human-like characteristics (emotions, memory, humour, etc etc), he just happens to speak a different language and have wheels instead of legs. {It's interesting to contrast sci-fi characters such as say "Data", "Spock" or "The Terminator", so are supposed to be extremely non-human (no emotions, etc), but they do happen to have humanoid forms.} I don't think this applies to all "droids" in Star Wars though, I think many droids seen have "no personality".
Interesting question arising: Is the term "robot" ever used in the Star Wars universe? I believe not. Only "droid" is ever used.