Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/488924170294542336
Post Reopened by Shevliaskovic, Ward - Trying Codidact, Jeff, Valorum, DVK-on-Ahch-To
Post Closed as "Opinion-based" by SQB, Meat Trademark, user931, K-H-W, Izkata
Question Protected by CommunityBot
edited title
Link
Valorum
  • 701.7k
  • 163
  • 4.7k
  • 4.9k

Hogwarts: So why aren't the kids doing it"doing it"?

Proper number list formatting
Source Link
jwodder
  • 7.5k
  • 2
  • 45
  • 46

So you've got Hogwarts, with several hundred adolescents obviously suffering from raging hormones, living in sexually integrated housing, and the incidence of hanky-panky beyond snogging is apparently zilch. Huh? How can this be?

The out-of-canon answers are more than adequate:

  1. JKR simply didn't want to write That Kind of Story (and I'm not convinced she could have if she tried). The author's choice is final.

    JKR simply didn't want to write That Kind of Story (and I'm not convinced she could have if she tried). The author's choice is final.

  2. Adding sex to the mix would have complicated the story horribly.

    Adding sex to the mix would have complicated the story horribly.

  3. Adding sex to the mix would have cast the moral incoherence of the wizard world into unbearably sharp relief.

    Adding sex to the mix would have cast the moral incoherence of the wizard world into unbearably sharp relief.

    And finally,
  4. JKR's core readership (preadolescents) wouldn't have stood for it. The cries of "Eeeeew!" would have been deafening. And the sales would have reflected that.

    JKR's core readership (preadolescents) wouldn't have stood for it. The cries of "Eeeeew!" would have been deafening. And the sales would have reflected that.

As far as I know, JKR dealt with the whole thing by simply and comprehensively ignoring it, so there's not likely any explanation within the books (although I could be wrong). Is there a mention of a "Sal Petrus" spell worked into the wardings of Hogwarts?

So. Has the subject come up? Has anyone had the chutzpah to ask JKR?

So you've got Hogwarts, with several hundred adolescents obviously suffering from raging hormones, living in sexually integrated housing, and the incidence of hanky-panky beyond snogging is apparently zilch. Huh? How can this be?

The out-of-canon answers are more than adequate:

  1. JKR simply didn't want to write That Kind of Story (and I'm not convinced she could have if she tried). The author's choice is final.
  2. Adding sex to the mix would have complicated the story horribly.
  3. Adding sex to the mix would have cast the moral incoherence of the wizard world into unbearably sharp relief. And finally,
  4. JKR's core readership (preadolescents) wouldn't have stood for it. The cries of "Eeeeew!" would have been deafening. And the sales would have reflected that.

As far as I know, JKR dealt with the whole thing by simply and comprehensively ignoring it, so there's not likely any explanation within the books (although I could be wrong). Is there a mention of a "Sal Petrus" spell worked into the wardings of Hogwarts?

So. Has the subject come up? Has anyone had the chutzpah to ask JKR?

So you've got Hogwarts, with several hundred adolescents obviously suffering from raging hormones, living in sexually integrated housing, and the incidence of hanky-panky beyond snogging is apparently zilch. Huh? How can this be?

The out-of-canon answers are more than adequate:

  1. JKR simply didn't want to write That Kind of Story (and I'm not convinced she could have if she tried). The author's choice is final.

  2. Adding sex to the mix would have complicated the story horribly.

  3. Adding sex to the mix would have cast the moral incoherence of the wizard world into unbearably sharp relief.

  4. JKR's core readership (preadolescents) wouldn't have stood for it. The cries of "Eeeeew!" would have been deafening. And the sales would have reflected that.

As far as I know, JKR dealt with the whole thing by simply and comprehensively ignoring it, so there's not likely any explanation within the books (although I could be wrong). Is there a mention of a "Sal Petrus" spell worked into the wardings of Hogwarts?

So. Has the subject come up? Has anyone had the chutzpah to ask JKR?

Source Link
WhatRoughBeast
  • 6.5k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 32

Hogwarts: So why aren't the kids doing it?

So you've got Hogwarts, with several hundred adolescents obviously suffering from raging hormones, living in sexually integrated housing, and the incidence of hanky-panky beyond snogging is apparently zilch. Huh? How can this be?

The out-of-canon answers are more than adequate:

  1. JKR simply didn't want to write That Kind of Story (and I'm not convinced she could have if she tried). The author's choice is final.
  2. Adding sex to the mix would have complicated the story horribly.
  3. Adding sex to the mix would have cast the moral incoherence of the wizard world into unbearably sharp relief. And finally,
  4. JKR's core readership (preadolescents) wouldn't have stood for it. The cries of "Eeeeew!" would have been deafening. And the sales would have reflected that.

As far as I know, JKR dealt with the whole thing by simply and comprehensively ignoring it, so there's not likely any explanation within the books (although I could be wrong). Is there a mention of a "Sal Petrus" spell worked into the wardings of Hogwarts?

So. Has the subject come up? Has anyone had the chutzpah to ask JKR?