Skip to main content
Grammar
Source Link
jwodder
  • 7.5k
  • 2
  • 45
  • 46

They would have had graves however they died. It's probably a mixture of the Dursley's abject performance as guardians, keeping a key reference point for the right moment in the story, orand Harry not needing to go from a personal point of view. Graves are just a marker. Harry had better sources of comfort once he realised the truth, such as their friendsfriends' memories and pictures that Hagrid gave him. Sorry I have no canon source for my opinion.

They would have had graves however they died. It's probably a mixture of the Dursley's abject performance as guardians, keeping a key reference point for the right moment in the story, or Harry not needing to go from a personal point of view. Graves are just a marker Harry had better sources of comfort once he realised the truth such as their friends memories and pictures that Hagrid gave him. Sorry I have no canon source for my opinion.

They would have had graves however they died. It's probably a mixture of the Dursley's abject performance as guardians, keeping a key reference point for the right moment in the story, and Harry not needing to go from a personal point of view. Graves are just a marker. Harry had better sources of comfort once he realised the truth, such as their friends' memories and pictures that Hagrid gave him. Sorry I have no canon source for my opinion.

Source Link
Pompom78
  • 720
  • 1
  • 4
  • 12

They would have had graves however they died. It's probably a mixture of the Dursley's abject performance as guardians, keeping a key reference point for the right moment in the story, or Harry not needing to go from a personal point of view. Graves are just a marker Harry had better sources of comfort once he realised the truth such as their friends memories and pictures that Hagrid gave him. Sorry I have no canon source for my opinion.