Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 22
    I love the films, don't get me wrong, but they are divergent enough from the literary world of Tolkien that I don't think they can be used to provide canonical answers. Also, even if Bilbo aged in Middle Earth, that point alone doesn't tell us anything about his aging or dying in the Undying Lands.
    – FoxMan2099
    Commented Aug 27, 2013 at 9:38
  • 14
    With all due respect to the films (ie, very little), that makes no sense: Gollum had had the Ring for hundreds of years, so he should have died immediately on losing it if this was what happened. Plus, Tolkien explicitly makes it clear that he would "just stop as he was when he parted with it". Commented Aug 27, 2013 at 9:56
  • 5
    The books make very clear that a great span of years passes between Bilbo losing possession of the Ring and his advanced age in Rivendell, and later at the end of ROTK. He advanced more quickly than he should have, but only in the sense that he was "catching up" to his actual age. In other words, he went from looking 50 to looking 131 in the time it took for him to age from 111 to 131.
    – user44330
    Commented Apr 22, 2015 at 22:00
  • 1
    This doesn't really answer the question. It just shows that in the movie, Bilbo visibly aged much faster without the powers of the One Ring.
    – TylerH
    Commented Dec 7, 2017 at 21:39