Timeline for How did the Rebel Alliance survive at Endor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2014 at 14:38 | comment | added | Valorum | I'd imagine that armed regulars would have a 10-1 superiority over lightly armed irregulars. All that means is that the other side needs to throw more men at the problem until it goes away. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 13:25 | comment | added | Jeff | @Richard: Oh no, it doesn't make you invincible. What it does is give you a fighting chance. It may even be a good chance, depending on circumstances. It doesn't guarantee anything. That said, Ackbar is (supposedly) a master tactician, exactly the sort who could capitalize on such a turn of events. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 7:52 | comment | added | Valorum | Michael Caine against the zulus would probably disagree. Organisation and better arms may give you tactical superiority but it doesn't make you invincible | |
| May 29, 2013 at 6:28 | comment | added | OpaCitiZen | Ably led? The rebels? Errr... "It's a trap!" ;) For further counterarguments, please see my A, and the debate below it, in the comments. Nonetheless, +1 for the great alternate point of view. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 20:37 | comment | added | Jeff | It's the 'Ably-led' part that flies in the face of most Zombie fiction. As a counter to that, look at The Walking Dead comics when the survivor's are in the 'safe' area (around issue 90-95) | |
| May 28, 2013 at 20:33 | comment | added | Xantec | Zombie-fiction would seem to fly in the face of your quote. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 20:29 | history | answered | Jeff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |