Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • Can you cite a source on radioactive material? It sounds right, but I can't remember any specific examples.
    – Drew
    Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 15:48
  • 2
    Not canon, but I suppose replicators could be limited to the elements below the "Island of stability" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability with Latinum being in or above the IoS.
    – Jaydee
    Commented Jan 6, 2015 at 16:47
  • 2
    Red matter is a reference to the well known red mercury hoax en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury
    – Gaius
    Commented Jan 10, 2015 at 7:41
  • "Any process which can take energy and essentially squeeze it into electrons and quarks and then glue quarks together to make protons and neutrons is already going to have more than enough power and precision to make any atom, no matter how complex." -- Where in Star Trek canon is it said that replicators can do these things? The TNG Technical manual says they use stored "raw material" which is rearranged to make food, and it refers to the "energy cost of molecular synthesis", which gave me the idea that the replicator builds structure at the molecular level and higher out of a stock of atoms.
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 16, 2015 at 21:53
  • What if, due to the way some critical function of a replicator works, that the "raw material" used for replicators is actually required to be liquid latinum? That would certainly answer every single question about the subject. Commented Jul 12, 2015 at 22:27