Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

12
  • 6
    @DVK if no in-world confirmation can be found, the only conclusion you can draw is based on the fact that such confirmation doesn't exist. Don't fall into the conspiracy theorist's trap that anything that anything that doesn't get discredited in your approved list of sources by definition is confirmed as true.
    – jwenting
    Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 8:51
  • 7
    @DVK true, but you can't show a link to a website certifying you searched dilligently and got no results :) And of course someone could always argue that if only you'd searched more you might have found something.
    – jwenting
    Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 15:05
  • 4
    @DVK Use kinder wording in your comments please.
    – user1027
    Commented Feb 22, 2013 at 15:50
  • 4
    @DVK Here you go. I was specifically referring to the terms 'shred of evidence', 'zero details', and 'mere guess'. There are gentler ways of phrasing your concerns, in the future please do so.
    – user1027
    Commented Feb 22, 2013 at 16:10
  • 4
    @DVK Next time, phrase your concerns more gently. Right here.
    – user1027
    Commented Feb 22, 2013 at 16:41