Timeline for Why are there two completely different depictions of the Nazgûl and their flying mounts in the cartoon version of The Return of the King?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2023 at 14:04 | comment | added | Stanley Webb | Both versions of the Nazguls' flying mounts might refer to the novels: Tolkien described the creatures as being survivors from an ancient time, and one of the early American paperback editions (The illegal edition) had a cover illustration of a Nazgul on a flying horse. | |
| Aug 18, 2023 at 7:25 | comment | added | Ian Thompson | Specuation: does the film ever make it clear that the Witch King is one of the Nazgul? I watched a youtube review (I don't think I can stomach the whole of that film), and noticed that he is referred to in one place as 'Sauron's second in command'. So maybe the Witch King is treated as a different entity to the Nazgul. | |
| Aug 18, 2023 at 2:07 | answer | added | Ben Murphy | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 18, 2023 at 1:23 | history | edited | Dosco Jones | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 18, 2023 at 1:08 | history | edited | Buzz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Aug 18, 2023 at 1:08 | comment | added | Buzz | @NKCampbell Wrong movie imdb.com/title/tt0077869 | |
| Aug 17, 2023 at 22:56 | comment | added | NKCampbell | it's easier to rotoscope a horse | |
| Aug 17, 2023 at 21:51 | comment | added | Mark Olson | Budget? Some work got done one way. Plans changed and they intended to re-do it all a different way, but ran out of money. | |
| Aug 17, 2023 at 21:43 | history | asked | Buzz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |