Skip to main content
Science Fiction & Fantasy

Return to Question

Post Reopened by Michael, Valorum, LogicDictates, DavidW, Null♦
deleted 96 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Added to review
Source Link
Valorum
Valorum
  • 701.7k
  • 163
  • 4.7k
  • 4.9k

Nitpicking; Federation starship designations Why are subsequent Enterprises designated NCC?

I seem to recall that in TOS the "NCC"'NCC' designation referred to "Constitution Class."Constitution Class" Yetyet all seen Federation starships seem to have that designation, regardless. 

Shouldn't the Enterprise  -D be "NGC-1701?"

Not nitpicking" The KLingons and Romulans apparently have dozens of dreadnought- size shipsNGC-1701, yet the Federation has only 2for example?

Nitpicking; Federation starship designations

I seem to recall that in TOS the "NCC" designation referred to "Constitution Class." Yet all seen Federation starships seem to have that designation. Shouldn't the Enterprise  -D be "NGC-1701?"

Not nitpicking" The KLingons and Romulans apparently have dozens of dreadnought- size ships, yet the Federation has only 2?

Why are subsequent Enterprises designated NCC?

I seem to recall that in TOS the 'NCC' designation referred to "Constitution Class" yet all Federation starships seem to have that designation, regardless. 

Shouldn't the Enterprise-D be NGC-1701, for example?

Post Closed as "Needs more focus" by F1Krazy, LogicDictates, fez, Paulie_D, DavidW
Source Link
Woody Quinn
Woody Quinn
  • 45
  • 1

Nitpicking; Federation starship designations

I seem to recall that in TOS the "NCC" designation referred to "Constitution Class." Yet all seen Federation starships seem to have that designation. Shouldn't the Enterprise -D be "NGC-1701?"

Not nitpicking" The KLingons and Romulans apparently have dozens of dreadnought- size ships, yet the Federation has only 2?