Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 5
    As additional information, one of the original models is now at the Smithsonian in Washington DC, and went through a very thorough refurbishment. One of several videos documenting the refurbishment process is here: youtube.com/watch?v=CA8D5lK8guE In this video is a discussion of the myriad of lighting effects inside the original model, and how the connections were made on the port side of the model.
    – Milwrdfan
    Commented May 4, 2021 at 0:57
  • 5
    The model can be seen at an online exhibit at airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/…. You can see the unfinished starboard side on e.g. photos 8 and 17. Commented May 4, 2021 at 2:08
  • Does Star Trek actually use the stern/bow terminology? I don't think I've ever heard that used with an aircraft or spacecraft before. We do use 'port' and 'starboard' in aviation, but I've always just heard 'forward' and 'aft' for front/back.
    – reirab
    Commented May 4, 2021 at 14:07
  • This answers the question for the TV show - did the movies have the same limitation? I know they went through several Enterprises over the course of the original-cast movies (and of course in IV they were in a stolen Klingon ship), but did they continue to follow the left-to-right rule even then, when they had a larger budget and presumably better models? Commented May 4, 2021 at 14:46
  • Thanks, this is exactly the real-world-based answer which I was looking for.
    – fgysin
    Commented May 5, 2021 at 7:27