Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 2
    This isn't the case at all. The fact of the matter is only one side of the ship was fully detailed. The other had cables for lighting hanging out of it. Commented May 5, 2021 at 13:34
  • 7
    @MatthewWhited And why did they decide to put the cables on that side of the model, instead of the other side? There's no contradiction between their explanation and your explanation.
    – MJ713
    Commented May 5, 2021 at 17:14
  • 1
    It might be worth adding a reference to the other answer here, or at least something along the lines of "They chose to fly from left to right because...". Just to make it explicit how this mental bias would have led to the setup that got built.
    – Bobson
    Commented May 5, 2021 at 17:52
  • 1
    @MJ713 there is no contradiction, but it may well be a coincidence. It is just a subjective evalution.
    – nurettin
    Commented May 5, 2021 at 19:42
  • 5
    @nurettin - The left-to-right for progress & right-to-left for setbacks is a well-known and widely utilized paradigm in the entertainment industry. You can find numerous references to it. It would be quite surprising if the Star Trek production team had not considered it when designing the prop. Commented May 5, 2021 at 19:54