Timeline for Why was the Klingon Chancellor not constantly challenged to duels?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31	history	edited	CommunityBot		Commonmark migration
Apr 27, 2020 at 9:18	vote	accept	CommunityBot
Apr 21, 2020 at 19:03	history	edited	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0	deleted 4 characters in body
Apr 21, 2020 at 11:15	vote	accept	CommunityBot
Apr 27, 2020 at 9:18
Apr 21, 2020 at 5:43	history	edited	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 196 characters in body
Apr 21, 2020 at 5:11	comment	added	Keith Morrison		There's also the practical aspect that if someone is killed by Chani people would accept that they'd never have been able to defeat Paul anyway.
Apr 21, 2020 at 4:15	comment	added	Howard Miller		It kind of reminds me of "Dune". People keep trying to challenge Muad'Dib, only to end up getting killed by Chani. Chani explains that it keeps the number of challengers that Paul has to kill down, keeping him from becoming unpopular and being accused of winning by witchcraft.
Apr 21, 2020 at 3:12	comment	added	Cadence		There's a scene in the novel The Art of the Impossible that reflects the importance of other warriors' support. Captain Kor declares his lack of faith in a weak Chancellor and we're told "A strong chancellor would have killed a ship captain that made such a pronouncement, especially in front of so many other members of the High Council. In fact, a strong chancellor would not have needed to do so, because those other members of the High Council would be falling all over each other to do it themselves. Instead, they stood their ground."
Apr 20, 2020 at 21:54	history	edited	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 757 characters in body
Apr 20, 2020 at 14:48	history	edited	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 525 characters in body
Apr 20, 2020 at 5:23	history	edited	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0	deleted 15 characters in body
Apr 20, 2020 at 5:18	history	answered	Keith Morrison	CC BY-SA 4.0