Timeline for Why did Griphook betray Harry in Deathly Hallows?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2022 at 4:58 | comment | added | BCLC | Ok fine. It's not really a betrayal but it's a huge hindrance to defeating Voldemort. If Voldemort wins then Griphook 'loses'. Makes sense to get Harry et al out to defeat Voldemort. I don't see any opportunity cost here. Ostensibly, Griphook has everything to gain and nothing to lose by getting them out or at least saving them. What am I missing? Edit: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/261438/… | |
| Dec 29, 2015 at 5:01 | history | bounty ended | Slytherincess | ||
| Jun 12, 2014 at 14:23 | comment | added | Michael Brown | That's not a knife... | |
| Mar 13, 2013 at 22:14 | comment | added | Michael Brown | Exactly, Griphook knew Harry had no intention of returning it and that he had no chance of standing up to the boy of legend (even if his success was more luck and wit than skill with the wand in a magical duel, Griphook didn't know this). | |
| Oct 7, 2012 at 16:37 | vote | accept | Slytherincess | ||
| Aug 30, 2012 at 11:16 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @DavidStratton - I hope that was said in a heavy Aussie accent :) | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 4:02 | comment | added | David Stratton | Now THAT is an answer. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 18:22 | history | edited | cjm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix typo
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 13:50 | history | edited | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 281 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 13:45 | history | edited | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 281 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 13:28 | history | edited | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 625 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 13:20 | history | answered | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |