Edit - Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2

This analogy works best with the example from the book - just as some anti-DDoS protection systems, Rorschach is not conscious and simply classifies the data as an attack. A false positive if you wish.
– Tomáš Zato
Commented Dec 17, 2019 at 16:26
14

@TomášZato-ReinstateMonica From Rorschach's perspective, it is an attack, and not a false positive. It has a very different definition of "attack" to us; one that does not take motive or malice into account, because Rorschach has no concept of such things.
– anaximander
Commented Dec 17, 2019 at 17:11

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »