Timeline for In Star Trek (2009), Did the Original Timeline Survive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 19, 2016 at 19:31 | comment | added | Wayne | I would say Spock's use of "altered the flow of history" implies that it is indeed the same timeline and not an alternate parallel timeline. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 16:22 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 10, 2012 at 16:29 | |||||
| Jul 16, 2012 at 23:58 | history | edited | dlanod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2012 at 23:22 | comment | added | Izkata | @KeithThompson For example, TNG 7x11, Parallels. | |
| Jul 16, 2012 at 22:51 | comment | added | Keith Thompson | Spock said it created a new chain of incidents, not that the old one was destroyed. And the word "alternate" could imply (though weakly) that the original timeline still "exists" in some sense. | |
| Jul 16, 2012 at 21:54 | history | answered | Thomas Boussum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |