Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 1
    IMO this cannot the reason except perhaps for Command-route officers (Red-shirts). Starfleet Engineers, Scientists, Medical staff - These do not get promoted to Commander, or a higher rank, regardless of their skils and capabilities in their posts. It is a purely optional advancement, and the requirements involve actual command of a ship or a similar unit, as we see in Lt. Commander Troi's candidacy exam.
    – einpoklum
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 14:12
  • 2
    Also, if this were the case, why give the flagship to a 50-year-old Captain? To supervise the kindergarten of youngsters? I dunno, doesn't sound convincing.
    – einpoklum
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 14:19
  • 3
    You wouldn’t want the most experienced engineers, scientists etc on board? That theory doesn’t hold up
    – Gaius
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 19:58
  • 3
    @Gaius: You could argue that the most experienced engineers and scientists run research groups at large bases. But, still, you would definitely want some experienced officers on the flagships, I would think.
    – einpoklum
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 20:41
  • 3
    @einpoklum Also, it's demonstatbly false that medical, science, and engineering track officers don't make commander or higher. From TOS, McCoy is known to have made admiral, and Scotty and Spock are known to have made captain (and Spock started as a commander). No Commented Jul 16, 2018 at 1:53