Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 8
    Dumbledore had six years in which he could, had he wished, have told Harry about his past. What makes you think a few months longer would have made any difference? Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 6:45
  • Well Dumbledore admits that he regretted not telling Harry things sooner at the end of Order of Phoenix. So he only really started telling Harry things from then on. To me, it felt that he was getting to the point of revealing everything to Harry in HBP (at least before I reached the end of DH). But anyway I am not saying that a few more months would have made a difference, I am asking why Harry resented Dumbledore at the beginning.
    – R_D
    Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 6:59
  • Yes, but your argument for why Harry shouldn't have resented Dumbledore rests on the assumption that Dumbledore would have told Harry these things had he lived - or, rather, that Harry would have thought that Dumbledore would have told Harry these things had he lived. I don't understand why you would expect Harry to believe that. Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 7:09
  • Ok. Fair point.
    – R_D
    Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 7:12
  • 6
    ... plus, of course, I believe it is normal enough to resent someone for dying, particularly if it was unexpected. Irrational, in most cases, but very human. Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 7:13