Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

10
  • 17
    “The Desolation of Smaug could be taken to mean the destruction of Smaug” — Not really, no. This doesn’t seem to be a valid usage of the word “desolate”, neither common nor uncommon. While “to desolate somebody” exists, its meaning is “to make (someone) feel utterly wretched and unhappy.”, not “to kill somebody”. And I don’t recall Bard bullying Smaug into unhappiness. Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 13:07
  • 2
    @KonradRudolph well, that seems to be more or less the interpretation the querant assumed when asking this question.
    – SQB
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 13:18
  • 3
    It's somewhat better, and I'll upvote, but I still think the key point is that OP is inventing a meaning for this phrase that it simply does not have in standard English. My guess is that the idea that "desolation" meant that Smaug would be killed, or even "desolated" (emotionally or otherwise), probably didn't occur to Tolkien or Jackson. Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 21:05
  • 2
    This answer could be vastly improved with freehand circles.
    – ibid
    Commented Jun 14, 2017 at 1:20
  • 5
    +1 This is the right answer (before MattGutting's edits to Daniel's answer). I'm very surprised that this answer wasn't given more upvotes. It shows more research effort and less of a commentary post.
    – Voronwé
    Commented Jun 14, 2017 at 2:09