Timeline for Are there any tools or code for analyzing Arrival logograms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 11, 2022 at 6:29 | answer | added | Valorum | timeline score: 4 | |
May 13, 2017 at 21:52 | history | edited | Gallifreyan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body; edited tags
|
Feb 7, 2017 at 19:10 | vote | accept | orome | ||
Feb 1, 2017 at 22:28 | history | reopened |
user40790 Gallifreyan Valorum Petersaber Adamant |
||
Feb 1, 2017 at 22:16 | history | edited | Valorum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 80 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2017 at 21:56 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Feb 1, 2017 at 22:30 | |||||
Feb 1, 2017 at 21:13 | history | closed |
Paulie_D Dave Johnson Politank-Z Ward - Trying Codidact Valorum |
Not suitable for this site | |
Feb 1, 2017 at 20:31 | history | edited | Gallifreyan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2017 at 20:29 | comment | added | user40790 | This isn't off topic, but I find the assumption of the language being fully realized, and thus able to be analyzed, to be dubious. | |
Feb 1, 2017 at 19:32 | history | edited | orome | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body; edited tags
|
Feb 1, 2017 at 19:07 | answer | added | Gallifreyan | timeline score: 18 | |
Feb 1, 2017 at 18:57 | comment | added | orome | @DanielRoseman: Indistinguishable FIAP. That's one of the several places I was referring to. | |
Feb 1, 2017 at 18:56 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 1, 2017 at 20:28 | |||||
Feb 1, 2017 at 18:56 | comment | added | Daniel Roseman | Don't think it was Mathematica, but Wolfram Language - see the blog post by Stephen Wolfram. | |
Feb 1, 2017 at 18:07 | history | asked | orome | CC BY-SA 3.0 |