Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Don't think it was Mathematica, but Wolfram Language - see the blog post by Stephen Wolfram. Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 18:56
  • @DanielRoseman: Indistinguishable FIAP. That's one of the several places I was referring to.
    – orome
    Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 18:57
  • 3
    This isn't off topic, but I find the assumption of the language being fully realized, and thus able to be analyzed, to be dubious.
    – user40790
    Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 20:29