Skip to main content
deleted 303 characters in body
Source Link
Null
  • 70.1k
  • 22
  • 299
  • 381

My answer to this question is simple as this. In order to walk around the ship that has no known centrifugal force creating gravity it is then a machine or device causing artificial gravity and thus anything in the ship would act as if being on a planet. Also if traveling in a sort of parabolic state that can relate to the motion of a planet and is caught in the gravitational pull of a planet as well as the ship having artificial gravity then there would be two separately gravitational for estimates acting on those aboard the ship. Because of this it would be fair to say that rolling, banking, pitch, yaw having to separate gravitational points may make the g-forces seem even more eradict. I hope this helps with the question and if not I would be more than open to trying to help decipher the true question being asked. But I think this is in the realm of the question askederratic. 

Also, Massthe mass of an object also promotes gravity. Such(such as the Death Star Space Station) promotes gravity. It is said that theThe larger the mass the more gravity things have and thathave; even the Great Pyramids have been said to have a gravitational pull. Non related from theory gravity has a direct reflection on the traverse of time no longer becoming linear or in one direction. Hope this helps.

My answer to this question is simple as this. In order to walk around the ship that has no known centrifugal force creating gravity it is then a machine or device causing artificial gravity and thus anything in the ship would act as if being on a planet. Also if traveling in a sort of parabolic state that can relate to the motion of a planet and is caught in the gravitational pull of a planet as well as the ship having artificial gravity then there would be two separately gravitational for estimates acting on those aboard the ship. Because of this it would be fair to say that rolling, banking, pitch, yaw having to separate gravitational points may make the g-forces seem even more eradict. I hope this helps with the question and if not I would be more than open to trying to help decipher the true question being asked. But I think this is in the realm of the question asked. Also, Mass of an object also promotes gravity. Such as the Death Star Space Station. It is said that the larger the mass the more gravity things have and that even the Great Pyramids have been said to have a gravitational pull. Non related from theory gravity has a direct reflection on the traverse of time no longer becoming linear or in one direction. Hope this helps.

In order to walk around the ship that has no known centrifugal force creating gravity it is then a machine or device causing artificial gravity and thus anything in the ship would act as if being on a planet. Also if traveling in a sort of parabolic state that can relate to the motion of a planet and is caught in the gravitational pull of a planet as well as the ship having artificial gravity then there would be two separately gravitational for estimates acting on those aboard the ship. Because of this it would be fair to say that rolling, banking, pitch, yaw having to separate gravitational points may make the g-forces seem even more erratic. 

Also, the mass of an object (such as the Death Star) promotes gravity. The larger the mass the more gravity things have; even the Great Pyramids have a gravitational pull. Non related from theory gravity has a direct reflection on the traverse of time no longer becoming linear or in one direction.

Source Link

My answer to this question is simple as this. In order to walk around the ship that has no known centrifugal force creating gravity it is then a machine or device causing artificial gravity and thus anything in the ship would act as if being on a planet. Also if traveling in a sort of parabolic state that can relate to the motion of a planet and is caught in the gravitational pull of a planet as well as the ship having artificial gravity then there would be two separately gravitational for estimates acting on those aboard the ship. Because of this it would be fair to say that rolling, banking, pitch, yaw having to separate gravitational points may make the g-forces seem even more eradict. I hope this helps with the question and if not I would be more than open to trying to help decipher the true question being asked. But I think this is in the realm of the question asked. Also, Mass of an object also promotes gravity. Such as the Death Star Space Station. It is said that the larger the mass the more gravity things have and that even the Great Pyramids have been said to have a gravitational pull. Non related from theory gravity has a direct reflection on the traverse of time no longer becoming linear or in one direction. Hope this helps.