Timeline for How to tackle heavy sphere redundancy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 2:19 | answer | added | Ian Malkav | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 5:05 | answer | added | user15055 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 2:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackRPG/status/484154668533026817 | ||
| Jul 1, 2014 at 21:21 | answer | added | Mu_ | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 14:21 | vote | accept | eimyr | ||
| Jul 1, 2014 at 14:01 | comment | added | eimyr | Following-up: I did accept that as vulgar without witnesses. He got hit by a backlash when police pathologist examined an intact bullet lodged in a brain matter without any entry path. We didn't like the rule preventing this anyway. | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 14:00 | answer | added | user2754 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 13:52 | comment | added | Jadasc | That bullet in the brain is Vulgar Without Witnesses at best. Of course, that's presuming HAP, rather than HOP. :) | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | eimyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 412 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2014 at 13:31 | answer | added | Jadasc | timeline score: 21 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 13:29 | answer | added | aragaer | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 13:24 | comment | added | OpaCitiZen | Just out of curiosity, which edition do you use? | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 12:54 | history | asked | eimyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |