Skip to main content
added 309 characters in body
Source Link
Jack
  • 36.4k
  • 13
  • 122
  • 219

Well, you "step into [the stone object]". You're stepping into it. So I think your description of "move through opened door" is apt. Beyond that, it's not defined. The DM can narrate.

Whether you can see inside the stone is not defined, but it seems entirely reasonable that you cannot. It would have been clearer if the spell had said you were blind while within the rock, but it did not. However, it seems reasonable you can't see, since there's rock in front of your eyes. If I mean, I guess there's rock in front of your eyes. You're magically "melded" into the rock, and that is not fully defined.

So, whether you can see to read a scroll is up to the DM, however, it's likely and reasonable that you can't see. If you can't see, you can't read a scroll.

Well, you "step into [the stone object]". You're stepping into it. Beyond that, it's not defined. The DM can narrate.

Whether you can see inside the stone is not defined, but it seems entirely reasonable that you cannot. It would have been clearer if the spell had said you were blind while within the rock, but it did not. However, it seems reasonable you can't see, since there's rock in front of your eyes. If you can't see, you can't read a scroll.

Well, you "step into [the stone object]". You're stepping into it. So I think your description of "move through opened door" is apt. Beyond that, it's not defined. The DM can narrate.

Whether you can see inside the stone is not defined, but it seems entirely reasonable that you cannot. It would have been clearer if the spell had said you were blind while within the rock, but it did not. However, it seems reasonable you can't see, since there's rock in front of your eyes. I mean, I guess there's rock in front of your eyes. You're magically "melded" into the rock, and that is not fully defined.

So, whether you can see to read a scroll is up to the DM, however, it's likely and reasonable that you can't see. If you can't see, you can't read a scroll.

added 463 characters in body
Source Link
Jack
  • 36.4k
  • 13
  • 122
  • 219

The source of the spell you cast is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", I think it works, to include scrolls. Your DM may think differently

However, there's one huge problem: can you see? The spell says:

you can't see what occurs outside [the stone]

Whether you can see inside the stone is not defined, but it seems entirely reasonable that you cannot. It would have been clearer if the spell had said you were blind while within the rock, but it did not. However, it seems reasonable you can't see, since there's rock in front of your eyes. If you can't see, you can't read a scroll.

The source of the spell you cast is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", I think it works, to include scrolls. Your DM may think differently.

The source of the spell you cast is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", I think it works, to include scrolls.

However, there's one huge problem: can you see? The spell says:

you can't see what occurs outside [the stone]

Whether you can see inside the stone is not defined, but it seems entirely reasonable that you cannot. It would have been clearer if the spell had said you were blind while within the rock, but it did not. However, it seems reasonable you can't see, since there's rock in front of your eyes. If you can't see, you can't read a scroll.

added 401 characters in body
Source Link
Jack
  • 36.4k
  • 13
  • 122
  • 219

The source of the spell you cast is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", itI think it works, to include scrolls. Your DM may think differently.

The source is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", it think it works, to include scrolls. Your DM may think differently.

The source of the spell you cast is not defined. As long as "you" are "casting a spell", I think it works, to include scrolls. Your DM may think differently.

added 401 characters in body
Source Link
Jack
  • 36.4k
  • 13
  • 122
  • 219
Loading
Source Link
Jack
  • 36.4k
  • 13
  • 122
  • 219
Loading