Timeline for Does Arcane Archer's "Magical Arrow" Ability work against antimagic field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26 at 15:50 | vote | accept | IUltimateMage | ||
| Mar 26 at 12:37 | comment | added | SeriousBri | But that consideration only matters because of the poorly worded power in this question. It is magically made to count as magic for certain purposes, but if it has magic then it should count as magic, not magic for certain purposes. | |
| Mar 26 at 12:35 | comment | added | SeriousBri | I am still not sure that "counts as magical for x purposes" means "magical". For example ki empowered strikes. I think it's more a poor way to say "still hurts big things" than really being about magic. Mostly. | |
| Mar 26 at 8:48 | comment | added | Nobody the Hobgoblin | @Hobbamok We have a Q&A on that. As a DM you can of course decide so, if you think it makes more sense. | |
| Mar 26 at 8:24 | comment | added | Hobbamok | Just from my feel I'd rule that the immunity to nonmagical damage is also suppressed for a lich | |
| Mar 25 at 16:36 | history | edited | Nobody the Hobgoblin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 25 at 16:30 | comment | added | Nobody the Hobgoblin | @SeriousBri I added a paragraph on it. | |
| Mar 25 at 16:26 | history | edited | Nobody the Hobgoblin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 25 at 16:26 | comment | added | SeriousBri | What takes precedence, the fact that it is magic, or the fact that it is magic "for certain purposes" because counting as magic and being magic are different. I think covering that might improve this answer. | |
| Mar 25 at 16:18 | history | edited | Nobody the Hobgoblin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 171 characters in body
|
| Mar 25 at 16:12 | history | answered | Nobody the Hobgoblin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |