Timeline for Does this creature, generated by ChatGPT, fit within the guidelines for monsters set by WoTC?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2023 at 15:12 | comment | added | Peter Pointer | @JackAidley I know that - but maybe some day it can be critical of itself. If not useful at least it could be funny, just like ChatGPT always is. Sorry for off-topic. | |
| Jun 12, 2023 at 14:28 | comment | added | Jack Aidley | @PeterKrebs ChatGPT understand precisely and exactly nothing. Don't confuse its ability to produce plausible looking answers that can be co-incidentally correct with actual understanding. | |
| Jun 9, 2023 at 9:31 | history | edited | Trish |
edited tags
|
|
| S May 3, 2023 at 21:38 | history | bounty ended | Jasmine | ||
| S May 3, 2023 at 21:38 | history | notice removed | Jasmine | ||
| May 2, 2023 at 19:40 | vote | accept | Jasmine | ||
| S May 2, 2023 at 19:40 | history | bounty started | Jasmine | ||
| S May 2, 2023 at 19:40 | history | notice added | Jasmine | Reward existing answer | |
| Apr 28, 2023 at 19:20 | comment | added | IT Alex | This seems like an extremely deadly encounter for lvl 3's. 4d6 is really high damage output against characters that will only have 3 hit dice worth of HP. If played by the DM as a somewhat intelligent creature, It will oneshot someone from stealth, use its lair action to outright kill or restrain most of the remaining party and easily clean up from there. This becomes a significantly less deadly encounter once the party has a bit more HP to prevent the insta downs due to the creatures low HP. | |
| Apr 28, 2023 at 13:23 | comment | added | Paul |
Careful on your wording - you misspelled statblock in the first question.
|
|
| Apr 28, 2023 at 12:11 | comment | added | Peter Pointer | Have you tried to ask ChatGPT those questions? Would be interesting to see how it understands itself. | |
| Apr 28, 2023 at 4:42 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 27, 2023 at 21:55 | comment | added | Jasmine | @Kirt "understand" is a hard concept to define in this case. If I asked the AI directly it absolutely does understand. When doing this I haven't primed it to remember that detail. I certainly think it might be an oversight | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 21:33 | comment | added | Kirt | Does the AI understand the difference between poison damage and the poisoned condition? I'm assuming that most monsters immune to the condition would also be immune to damage, or at the very least resistant? | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 21:21 | answer | added | Dan B | timeline score: 25 | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 21:07 | comment | added | Jasmine | @NautArch Made an edit Addressing your points. Hoping someone with experience than I do can take a look over it. | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 21:06 | history | edited | Jasmine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited to address a comment
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 20:48 | comment | added | NotArch | Do you think it is? Have you done an analysis first to see how it works and what may be an issue? What were the prompts that you gave the AI? What new guidelines are you referencing for Monster creation? | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 20:46 | history | edited | Jasmine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
made the title more concise
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 20:39 | history | asked | Jasmine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |