Timeline for How can I word an aspect that I can potentially veto being compelled without using an X-Card?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2022 at 13:18 | comment | added | AncientSwordRage | Good edit! I don't think it completely changes my opinion but it's good. | |
| Dec 7, 2022 at 11:36 | history | edited | Philipp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2022 at 8:57 | history | edited | Philipp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 438 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2022 at 23:21 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Aug 5, 2022 at 12:54 | comment | added | AncientSwordRage | If I could make up my mind before the session I wouldn't have had to ask this question, because then I'd probably know how to word the aspect. | |
| Aug 5, 2022 at 12:33 | comment | added | Philipp | @AncientSwordRage Well, you can always ask to interrupt the session and negotiate additional rules. But it could get pretty annoying for the rest of the group if you constantly bog down the session by meta-discussions. So it would be good if you would make up your mind before you start playing. And if you can't, then you should really reconsider if you are comfortable with having that character aspect at all. | |
| Aug 5, 2022 at 12:31 | history | edited | Philipp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2022 at 12:31 | comment | added | AncientSwordRage | Part of my issue is that I don't think I am sure what restrictions I need to propose in session zero. How would you handle the situation where the cannibal realises they also don't want the aspect compelled when some other group are involved mid-game? | |
| Aug 5, 2022 at 12:26 | history | answered | Philipp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |