Timeline for Does a centaur PC also count as being mounted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2019 at 9:31 | comment | added | Angew is no longer proud of SO | @BillK I don't know if it still applies in 5e, but in 3.5e, the requirement was for a mount to "be willing and able to carry you in the usual fashion" (or something to that effect). They gave examples "a tiger may be able but not willing. A giant may be willing but not truly able." | |
| Jun 24, 2019 at 7:38 | comment | added | Grollo | @BillK I guess anything you couldn't position yourself on top of/holding on to. It could be things like oozes or water elementals where there's no surface, ghosts that are incorporeal, or any other reason that might apply for a homebrewed creature - like a giant hedgehog, that you can't ride because of the spines. | |
| Jun 24, 2019 at 6:32 | comment | added | Bill K | So just out of curiosity, what do you think the designers were intending to exclude with the "Appropriate anatomy" comment? Ghosts? | |
| Jun 23, 2019 at 23:49 | vote | accept | Code Monkey | ||
| Jun 23, 2019 at 21:55 | history | answered | Kuerten | CC BY-SA 4.0 |