Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. To be honest with you, I am even more confused now. So you buy "expensive" stocks expecting them to rise? Wouldn't that make them relatively "cheap" again?!? $\endgroup$
    – vonjd
    Commented Jul 3 at 7:20
  • $\begingroup$ @vonjd Sorry for the confusion but you're right. It can make sense to buy expensive stocks if they turn out to massively go up in value. NVIDIA and Google were expensive (relative to its fundamentals) five years ago, but investing in them has paid off anyway. On average, cheap value stocks outperform expensive growth stocks. Hence the famous value premium. But that does not mean that every growth stock is a sucker. Indeed, amongst the generally poor performing expensive growth stocks there are some great stocks. Identifying them is difficult but pays off. Growth investors try to do this. $\endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Commented Jul 3 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ I accepted your answer. I, of course, understand the metrics but I think the whole concept is flawed. Value has now underperformed growth for several years which means that in this timespan "expensive" was cheaper than "cheap". Obviously, the market (which is still the master of us all) "thought" that those stocks were mispriced. In the end, it all boils down to finding stocks that are mispriced relative to the only metric that really counts: future returns. Thoughts? $\endgroup$
    – vonjd
    Commented Jul 4 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ @vonjd Thanks! I wouldn't quite agree with everything you said. In particular, I disagree with the word "mispricing". There are just as many rational/risk-based explanations why value stocks might outperform growth stocks than there are mispricing/behavioural stories. So you could just earn a high return because you take on more risk, which is totally fine $\endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Commented Jul 5 at 9:33