Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • $\begingroup$ Is it possible with only 4 pieces? $\endgroup$
    – sunfishho
    Commented Jul 12, 2019 at 1:12
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, wanted to say that was a great puzzle, especially the bishop mate :) @RewanDemontay $\endgroup$
    – sunfishho
    Commented Jul 12, 2019 at 2:57
  • $\begingroup$ "2 knights cannot mate a king by themselves if the opposing side has waiting moves." Isn't it the reverse? I understood that 2 knights cannot force mate by themselves (unless they can mate in 1), but in KNN v KP the knights win (unless the P can safely queen & start checking) exactly because the defender has waiting-moves with the P which prevent a stalemate defence. $\endgroup$
    – Rosie F
    Commented Jul 12, 2019 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ @RosieF whoops thanks for catching that error! $\endgroup$
    – sunfishho
    Commented Jul 12, 2019 at 5:45
  • $\begingroup$ @RewanDemontay For a knight winning position, one can add a white rook on a5 to im_so_meta_even_this_acronym 's original position (so 5 pieces in total). Then 1.f8=N will be the only winning move (for the very same reason, since white rook has no checks), while other moves do not even give a draw! For the rook winning position, 1. f8=R is definitely the best move (it gives mate in 2), but it's unfortunately not the only one which wins (since 1.Ke7 or 1.Ke6 followed by 2.f8=Q also wins). $\endgroup$
    – trolley813
    Commented Jul 12, 2019 at 7:41