Timeline for Pawninos-44 Checks In A Row
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 1:21 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify a bit
|
| S Apr 30, 2019 at 1:12 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
not 48 nor 47
|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 1:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 30, 2019 at 1:12 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2019 at 1:05 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
not 48
|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:58 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
link
|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:57 | comment | added | noedne | @GarethMcCaughan In Lichess you can promote the variation you want to keep until it is the main one, then delete the alternative variations. | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:55 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | Hopefully-correct PGN now in answer. Will see if I can persuade lichess to give me a URL for it. | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:54 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix markup
|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:49 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | Now I've reconstructed it, or an equivalent, but I can't get the lichess interface to delete irrelevant variations without deleting the main line. sigh | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:46 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | It currently appears that I can't. I carelessly deleted my 46-check solution from the lichess analysis board and now can't reconstruct it. (I am about 99% sure I didn't hallucinate having it.) | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:38 | vote | accept | Rewan Demontay | ||
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:40 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:07 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | Yeah, I have goofed: some of those moves are illegal. I do have a different working 46-mover but I want to see whether I can do more (in the "second category"). | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:06 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | I will. But I'm not sure I haven't goofed, so I won't transcribe it yet. | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 0:00 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | I unretracted it because it is a better "second-category" solution than noedne's (which isn't trying to be a "second-category" solution since you added that bit of the question after they posted their solution). | |
| Apr 29, 2019 at 23:59 | history | edited | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
second category
|
| Apr 29, 2019 at 23:58 | history | undeleted | Gareth McCaughan♦ | ||
| Apr 29, 2019 at 23:30 | history | deleted | Gareth McCaughan♦ | via Vote | |
| Apr 29, 2019 at 23:30 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | Retracted since in fact it turns out we can do two more and someone else has done it. | |
| Apr 29, 2019 at 23:30 | history | answered | Gareth McCaughan♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |