Skip to main content
Puzzling

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • $\begingroup$ I am still trying to figure this puzzle out, but it cannot be one of the knights who were in the battle. Only 1 Knight is shown to survive the battle and that one is the king's son. The king's son survived the charge (mentioned: first phase) and he was a knight (mentioned: after arriving at castle). $\endgroup$
    – Shanty
    Commented Mar 12, 2019 at 5:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Shanty In the comments, the OP states that if a piece is removed from the board, it is not necessarily dead, as evidenced by the king having his son and two other knights still alive after the battle. So his son could have survived the initial charge but was wounded a removed from the battle later on. Also, it is never stated the king only has one son - he could have been talking to another son who was a knight but wasn't in the battle. $\endgroup$
    – Amorydai
    Commented Mar 12, 2019 at 6:09
  • $\begingroup$ In the second diagram, the piece in question had to come from a certain field (rot13: sbkgebgfvk) if he was the last to move. It could have moved to (rot13: pnrfnesvir ) and attacked (rot13: oenibguerr). $\endgroup$
    – nishuba
    Commented Mar 12, 2019 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ @RewanDemontay Ok then, I got an update, this is my final answer! LOL $\endgroup$
    – Amorydai
    Commented Mar 13, 2019 at 5:08
  • $\begingroup$ +1 for the update. There does not seem to be enough evidence of treachery to easily figure out the traitor using just the maps. $\endgroup$
    – Shanty
    Commented Mar 13, 2019 at 7:46