Timeline for Art Accident at Airport!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:37 | comment | added | Trenin | @paramesis I totally get what you are saying BTW. I didn't read those clues that way, but I can see how they would be. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:36 | comment | added | Trenin | @paramesis How about "Either Mike or a different person flying out of concourse F flew United." A little less wordy, yet conveys the same meaning. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:14 | comment | added | paramesis | This is the first answer to produce a full, logically valid solve path. At the time of the award, all of the other answers were incomplete or happened to arrive at the correct answer through specious, unsubstantiated reasoning. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:14 | history | bounty ended | paramesis | ||
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:07 | vote | accept | paramesis | ||
| Mar 24, 2017 at 13:01 | comment | added | paramesis | This type of clue has been interpreted differently in different places. On another forum, I posted a puzzle with a similar clue and everyone there interpreted Either ___ or ____ to imply that they were different people. I've edited the puzzle to explicitly state all previously implied statements. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:53 | comment | added | Trenin | @paramesis Why does that imply that? The statement is still true if Mike flies out of concourse F. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:52 | comment | added | paramesis | Mary 2 states that Either Mike or the person flying out of concourse F flew United, which implies that Mike is not flying out of concourse F | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:50 | comment | added | Trenin | @paramesis Which implied statements am I missing? Alternatively, can you disproove any of the solutions based on the clues? I am pretty sure I went through them all and they are all satisfied. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:42 | comment | added | paramesis | I looked at your grid and it looks like you're missing the implied statements, as indicated in consider the following 3 and clarified in the question comments. I mention this directly because I recognize that some logic grids do not use this convention. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2659 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:38 | comment | added | Trenin | @paramesis So I found 3 solutions in the end. I went through them with all the clues and they are all sound. Perhaps I am missing something? | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2659 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2017 at 20:52 | comment | added | paramesis | You're a few short steps from finishing your answer. I hope you do so so I can award the bounty and accept. | |
| Mar 23, 2017 at 17:03 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3045 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2017 at 16:42 | comment | added | paramesis | That's quite a long trial and error, but it is logically sound. You've progressed furthest so far. | |
| Mar 23, 2017 at 16:20 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3045 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1318 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2017 at 16:14 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 341 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2017 at 16:04 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 341 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2017 at 15:55 | history | edited | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 341 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2017 at 15:48 | history | answered | Trenin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |