Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What if Kleptomaniac(K) steals the message in step 1? Jane(J) receives the box from Mike(M), but receives no message. Jane does not know to respond with an answer, therefore step 3 onward do not occur. M--> J (Locked box) and M-->K (message). Mike still has the ring and Jane has a useless box. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 3, 2016 at 21:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Matthew0898: your comment gives a way for K to block the exchange from working, but not a way for K to steal the ring. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 3, 2016 at 21:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If Klep copies the instructions and replaces the box with a box with Kleps question, then it is not true that M knows J has M's box. Klep replaces M's key and the passphrase from J with the passphase Klep got out of M's box using M's key. $\endgroup$
    – Ole Tange
    Commented Apr 3, 2016 at 22:41
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't see how step 3 would work. If he sends the key and it's not inside a locked box, the key will be stolen..? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2016 at 7:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Updated steps 1.5 The middleman keeps Marks box and sends Jane a decoy box and the letter 3.5 Mark sends the key but middleman gets it first. 4.The middleman uses it to open the padlocked box that they kept. 6.The middleman sends the passphrase back to Mark. $\endgroup$
    – ponsfonze
    Commented Apr 4, 2016 at 10:23