Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • $\begingroup$ Similar to my own solution! Do you believe it's possible to achieve $n=3$ with a position involving castles from both players? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12 at 21:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah yes, the discovered check from a paralysed piece does it! I was having a really hard time getting back to the repeated position with a legal game, while not adding an extra move option for white. $\endgroup$
    – Bass
    Commented Feb 12 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think you need to paralyse the knight by the way; it's white's hurry to create a non-irrevocable move for black that makes the position work in the first place, so the pawns at d7 and e6 aren't really necessary. $\endgroup$
    – Bass
    Commented Feb 12 at 22:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Bass If the knight moves, then the black king is no longer trapped. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ @ElliotGlazer Re n=3 I really have no idea. It might be but I don't see an obvious strategy. $\endgroup$
    – loopy walt
    Commented Feb 12 at 22:43