Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Just give it some time. Enigmatic puzzles usually take time to get some interested puzzlers, by its nature. $\endgroup$
    – justhalf
    Commented Jun 6, 2023 at 3:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Personally, I find this whole "of doesn't mean of" and the like needlessly confusing. If you want to say that A takes some from B then you wouldn't confuse people who interpret of as a fraction. The definition of nvo is not comprehensible. All these leads me to believe that this will end up something that makes sense only to the puzzle setter. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2023 at 23:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KateGregory, it's better if it confuses people more :D If it's not comprehensible, try to decode what it means. And no, you have to figure it out. The puzzle is deliberately framed so. justhalf, indeed. They take too much time, apparently. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 3:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @justhalf, it's actually an easy puzzle. A tag which would give a big hint isn't there, so I couldn't add it. But even without the tag, it's easy. Just solve it like you'd solve any other puzzle: carefully and shrewdly. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 3:22
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @TheAmateurCoder that's all fine, just be aware that as a puzzle setter, what's easy for you might not be easy for solvers :) But I'll give this the benefit of doubt and I'll just see when the answer is revealed whether this is a good puzzle or not (since this is an enigmatic puzzle, the quality is hard to judge until someone solves it) $\endgroup$
    – justhalf
    Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 4:50