Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ According to the question the clock is not broken and the two hands would stay dependent, which gives 720 values, not 3600. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 18, 2023 at 2:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Andrew Savinykh Ahh, I did not realise about the dependent part. Well, I hope that my answer is still useful to design other strategies. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 20, 2023 at 9:15