Skip to main content

Timeline for Twenty-four coins

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 28, 2023 at 19:19 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 47 characters in body
Feb 28, 2023 at 7:25 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 60 characters in body
Feb 27, 2023 at 19:54 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 6 characters in body
Feb 27, 2023 at 19:18 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1309 characters in body
Feb 27, 2023 at 19:10 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1309 characters in body
Feb 24, 2023 at 11:35 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 222 characters in body
Feb 24, 2023 at 7:19 comment added Kris Van Bael Of course, thank you.
Feb 22, 2023 at 8:48 comment added Nautilus ++++ means the fakes average out to a normal coin, and both are in the same split group of 3. It should make $3!*8=48$, not $96$.
Feb 21, 2023 at 22:59 comment added Kris Van Bael Do all these tracks actually end within 8 measurements? Eg. I believe that the ++++ branch leaves you with 96 combinations, which is not possible in 4 weighting’s.
Feb 19, 2023 at 16:00 comment added Nautilus I just hope now that I didn't overlook anything.
Feb 19, 2023 at 15:59 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1558 characters in body
Feb 19, 2023 at 9:02 comment added Pumbaa Could the steps after ++++ be described in more detail, please? The omitted following steps might be not that obvious/self-evident to some readers. :D
Feb 18, 2023 at 22:27 comment added Retudin You are missing the case that if the first group is heavier than both the second and the third, the fakes can be in group 1 and 4
Feb 18, 2023 at 18:16 comment added Nautilus Edited, sorry about that.
Feb 18, 2023 at 18:16 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 457 characters in body
Feb 18, 2023 at 15:40 comment added Pumbaa An error in step ++: If we also get a balanced result from that, the fakes must be in the 1st (average is normal) or 4th. - No, the fakes might also be in the 2nd (average is normal) or 3rd (average is normal).
Feb 18, 2023 at 13:16 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 21 characters in body
Feb 18, 2023 at 13:08 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3686 characters in body
Feb 17, 2023 at 11:06 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 216 characters in body
Feb 17, 2023 at 11:04 comment added Nautilus We just need to find the two fakes in no particular order, but even so you can't identify them without differentiating them from each other when their average weight equals a normal coin's.
Feb 17, 2023 at 10:02 comment added Bernardo Recamán Santos No way of reducing answer to 7 using both devices?
Feb 16, 2023 at 16:11 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 87 characters in body
Feb 16, 2023 at 16:10 comment added Trenin NVM - I see now what you have done. I am still not sure I agree, but I see now how it has been accounted for.
Feb 16, 2023 at 16:05 comment added Trenin I think you need to differentiate the case where "both are lighter than normal and the same weight" from "both are lighter than normal, but one is heavier than the other".
Feb 16, 2023 at 16:03 comment added Nautilus I already took them all into account: "both could be lighter than normal, both could be heavier, or when only one is lighter, the sum could be heavier/lighter/equal than/to two normal coins."
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:57 comment added Trenin I think there are even more possibilities. Both lighter and the same, Both lighter and different, Both heavier and the same, both heavier and different, the average is heavier, the average is lighter, the average is genuine. So 7 total.
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:33 history undeleted Nautilus
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:32 history edited Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 69 characters in body
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:23 history deleted Nautilus via Vote
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:22 comment added Trenin Do you need to differentiate the following possibilities as well: the two coins together are lighter than two normal coins, and the two coins together are heavier than two normal coins.
Feb 16, 2023 at 15:08 history answered Nautilus CC BY-SA 4.0