Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
(adding some hints, including the ones I left in a comment to ZackWolske's attempt)
Source Link
pregunton
  • 461
  • 3
  • 10

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?consider $(...10)^{...01}$), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

There are finitely many.

Hint 2:

Focus on the last digit only. Look at small bases like unary, bijective base-$2$, bijective base-$3$, etc. (you can use a computer if you want). See if you can find some pattern in the cases that work, and what's the problem in the cases that don't.

Hint 3:

Try to express the patterns you found in terms of modular arithmetic. As with anything involving modulos and powers, you will need this, or some strengthened version of it.

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

There are finitely many.

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (consider $(...10)^{...01}$), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

There are finitely many.

Hint 2:

Focus on the last digit only. Look at small bases like unary, bijective base-$2$, bijective base-$3$, etc. (you can use a computer if you want). See if you can find some pattern in the cases that work, and what's the problem in the cases that don't.

Hint 3:

Try to express the patterns you found in terms of modular arithmetic. As with anything involving modulos and powers, you will need this, or some strengthened version of it.

Notice added Draw attention by pregunton
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by pregunton
restricted the problem to positive numbers, which doesn't change the solution but simplifies the question a little
Source Link
pregunton
  • 461
  • 3
  • 10

Imagine I have two nonnegativepositive integers, $a$ and $b$. Can you find the last digit of the sum $a+b$ given only the last digits of $a$ and $b$? More generally, can you find the last $n$ digits of $a+b$ given only the last $n$ digits of $a$ and $b$? The answer to both questions is yes: for example, any number of the form $...123$ added to any number of the form $...789$ always results in a number of the form $...912$.

What about the last $n$ digits of the product $a\times b$? There is also a unique answer in this case: for example, $(...47) \times (...38) = ...86$ always.

What about the last $n$ digits of the power $a^b$ (where we take $0^0=1$)? Sadly, here the whole thing breaks down: except in very rare cases, the last digits of a power cannot in general be determined from the last digits of the base and exponent. For example, $13^{14} = ...9$, but $13^{24}=...1$, so $(...3)^{...4}$ is not uniquely determined. So our ordinary decimal notation behaves well with respect to sums and products, but not with respect to exponentiation. That's a shame! Could this "issue" perhaps be fixed by changing our number system to something more... powerful?


Let $\operatorname{last}_n a$ denote the number obtained by taking the last $n$ digits of the number $a$ (and $\operatorname{last}_n a = a$ if $a$ has less than $n$ digits). For example, we have $\operatorname{last}_3 14835 = 835$, $\operatorname{last}_4 57 = 57$ and $\operatorname{last}_2 302 = 02 = 2$. We've seen that $\operatorname{last}_n (a+b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a + \operatorname{last}_n b)$ and $\operatorname{last}_n (a\times b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a \times \operatorname{last}_n b)$ for all $a, b$ and all $n>0$. We'll say that a number system is a powerful number system if additionally we have $$\operatorname{last}_n (a^b) = \operatorname{last}_n((\operatorname{last}_n a)^{\operatorname{last}_n b}).$$

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

  • The bijective base-$B$ number systems are like ordinary base-$B$ numbers, but instead of the digits going from $0$ to $B-1$, they go from $1$ to $B$ (and zero is represented by the empty string). The most famous instance is unary notation or bijective base-$1$, in which a number is represented by writing that many $1$s in succession. For example, the list of positive numbers in bijective base-$10$ notation goes like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \mathrm A, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1{\mathrm A}, 21, \ldots$$1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \mathrm A, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1{\mathrm A}, 21, \ldots$ (where the digit $\mathrm A$ represents ten).

  • The factorial number system is a system which is not tied to any base in particular; instead, it is such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $0$ to $k-1$ (so in theory this base needs infinitely many symbols, but only a finite amount is needed to represent a given number). The list of positive numbers in this notation goes like $0, 10, 100, 110, 200, 210, 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1200, 1210, 2000, 2010, 2100, 2110, 2200, 2210, 3000, 3010, \ldots$$10, 100, 110, 200, 210, 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1200, 1210, 2000, 2010, 2100, 2110, 2200, 2210, 3000, 3010, \ldots$. This number system is called as such because the factorial $N! = N \times (N-1) \times \cdots \times 2 \times 1$ of any number $N$ is easily expressed in this notation as an $1$ followed by $N$ zeros. For example, $6!$ is expressed as $1000000$.

  • Finally, we can combine the ideas of the bijective and factorial number systems by defining the bijectorial number system: a system such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $1$ to $k$. The numbers in this notation go like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 11, 21, 111, 121, 211, 221, 311, 321, 1111, \ldots$$1, 11, 21, 111, 121, 211, 221, 311, 321, 1111, \ldots$

Can you find all powerful number systems among the mentioned ones (bijective base-$B$ for some $B$, factorial, bijectorial)?


Hint:

There are finitely many.

Imagine I have two nonnegative integers, $a$ and $b$. Can you find the last digit of the sum $a+b$ given only the last digits of $a$ and $b$? More generally, can you find the last $n$ digits of $a+b$ given only the last $n$ digits of $a$ and $b$? The answer to both questions is yes: for example, any number of the form $...123$ added to any number of the form $...789$ always results in a number of the form $...912$.

What about the last $n$ digits of the product $a\times b$? There is also a unique answer in this case: for example, $(...47) \times (...38) = ...86$ always.

What about the last $n$ digits of the power $a^b$ (where we take $0^0=1$)? Sadly, here the whole thing breaks down: except in very rare cases, the last digits of a power cannot in general be determined from the last digits of the base and exponent. For example, $13^{14} = ...9$, but $13^{24}=...1$, so $(...3)^{...4}$ is not uniquely determined. So our ordinary decimal notation behaves well with respect to sums and products, but not with respect to exponentiation. That's a shame! Could this "issue" perhaps be fixed by changing our number system to something more... powerful?


Let $\operatorname{last}_n a$ denote the number obtained by taking the last $n$ digits of the number $a$ (and $\operatorname{last}_n a = a$ if $a$ has less than $n$ digits). For example, we have $\operatorname{last}_3 14835 = 835$, $\operatorname{last}_4 57 = 57$ and $\operatorname{last}_2 302 = 02 = 2$. We've seen that $\operatorname{last}_n (a+b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a + \operatorname{last}_n b)$ and $\operatorname{last}_n (a\times b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a \times \operatorname{last}_n b)$ for all $a, b$ and all $n>0$. We'll say that a number system is a powerful number system if additionally we have $$\operatorname{last}_n (a^b) = \operatorname{last}_n((\operatorname{last}_n a)^{\operatorname{last}_n b}).$$

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

  • The bijective base-$B$ number systems are like ordinary base-$B$ numbers, but instead of the digits going from $0$ to $B-1$, they go from $1$ to $B$ (and zero is represented by the empty string). The most famous instance is unary notation or bijective base-$1$, in which a number is represented by writing that many $1$s in succession. For example, the list of numbers in bijective base-$10$ notation goes like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \mathrm A, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1{\mathrm A}, 21, \ldots$ (where the digit $\mathrm A$ represents ten).

  • The factorial number system is a system which is not tied to any base in particular; instead, it is such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $0$ to $k-1$ (so in theory this base needs infinitely many symbols, but only a finite amount is needed to represent a given number). The list of positive numbers in this notation goes like $0, 10, 100, 110, 200, 210, 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1200, 1210, 2000, 2010, 2100, 2110, 2200, 2210, 3000, 3010, \ldots$. This number system is called as such because the factorial $N! = N \times (N-1) \times \cdots \times 2 \times 1$ of any number $N$ is easily expressed in this notation as an $1$ followed by $N$ zeros. For example, $6!$ is expressed as $1000000$.

  • Finally, we can combine the ideas of the bijective and factorial number systems by defining the bijectorial number system: a system such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $1$ to $k$. The numbers in this notation go like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 11, 21, 111, 121, 211, 221, 311, 321, 1111, \ldots$

Can you find all powerful number systems among the mentioned ones (bijective base-$B$ for some $B$, factorial, bijectorial)?


Hint:

There are finitely many.

Imagine I have two positive integers, $a$ and $b$. Can you find the last digit of the sum $a+b$ given only the last digits of $a$ and $b$? More generally, can you find the last $n$ digits of $a+b$ given only the last $n$ digits of $a$ and $b$? The answer to both questions is yes: for example, any number of the form $...123$ added to any number of the form $...789$ always results in a number of the form $...912$.

What about the last $n$ digits of the product $a\times b$? There is also a unique answer in this case: for example, $(...47) \times (...38) = ...86$ always.

What about the last $n$ digits of the power $a^b$? Sadly, here the whole thing breaks down: except in very rare cases, the last digits of a power cannot in general be determined from the last digits of the base and exponent. For example, $13^{14} = ...9$, but $13^{24}=...1$, so $(...3)^{...4}$ is not uniquely determined. So our ordinary decimal notation behaves well with respect to sums and products, but not with respect to exponentiation. That's a shame! Could this "issue" perhaps be fixed by changing our number system to something more... powerful?


Let $\operatorname{last}_n a$ denote the number obtained by taking the last $n$ digits of the number $a$ (and $\operatorname{last}_n a = a$ if $a$ has less than $n$ digits). For example, we have $\operatorname{last}_3 14835 = 835$, $\operatorname{last}_4 57 = 57$ and $\operatorname{last}_2 302 = 02 = 2$. We've seen that $\operatorname{last}_n (a+b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a + \operatorname{last}_n b)$ and $\operatorname{last}_n (a\times b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a \times \operatorname{last}_n b)$ for all $a, b$ and all $n>0$. We'll say that a number system is a powerful number system if additionally we have $$\operatorname{last}_n (a^b) = \operatorname{last}_n((\operatorname{last}_n a)^{\operatorname{last}_n b}).$$

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

  • The bijective base-$B$ number systems are like ordinary base-$B$ numbers, but instead of the digits going from $0$ to $B-1$, they go from $1$ to $B$. The most famous instance is unary notation or bijective base-$1$, in which a number is represented by writing that many $1$s in succession. For example, the list of positive numbers in bijective base-$10$ notation goes like $1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \mathrm A, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1{\mathrm A}, 21, \ldots$ (where the digit $\mathrm A$ represents ten).

  • The factorial number system is a system which is not tied to any base in particular; instead, it is such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $0$ to $k-1$ (so in theory this base needs infinitely many symbols, but only a finite amount is needed to represent a given number). The list of positive numbers in this notation goes like $10, 100, 110, 200, 210, 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1200, 1210, 2000, 2010, 2100, 2110, 2200, 2210, 3000, 3010, \ldots$. This number system is called as such because the factorial $N! = N \times (N-1) \times \cdots \times 2 \times 1$ of any number $N$ is easily expressed in this notation as an $1$ followed by $N$ zeros. For example, $6!$ is expressed as $1000000$.

  • Finally, we can combine the ideas of the bijective and factorial number systems by defining the bijectorial number system: a system such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $1$ to $k$. The numbers in this notation go like $1, 11, 21, 111, 121, 211, 221, 311, 321, 1111, \ldots$

Can you find all powerful number systems among the mentioned ones (bijective base-$B$ for some $B$, factorial, bijectorial)?


Hint:

There are finitely many.

Source Link
pregunton
  • 461
  • 3
  • 10

Powerful number systems

Imagine I have two nonnegative integers, $a$ and $b$. Can you find the last digit of the sum $a+b$ given only the last digits of $a$ and $b$? More generally, can you find the last $n$ digits of $a+b$ given only the last $n$ digits of $a$ and $b$? The answer to both questions is yes: for example, any number of the form $...123$ added to any number of the form $...789$ always results in a number of the form $...912$.

What about the last $n$ digits of the product $a\times b$? There is also a unique answer in this case: for example, $(...47) \times (...38) = ...86$ always.

What about the last $n$ digits of the power $a^b$ (where we take $0^0=1$)? Sadly, here the whole thing breaks down: except in very rare cases, the last digits of a power cannot in general be determined from the last digits of the base and exponent. For example, $13^{14} = ...9$, but $13^{24}=...1$, so $(...3)^{...4}$ is not uniquely determined. So our ordinary decimal notation behaves well with respect to sums and products, but not with respect to exponentiation. That's a shame! Could this "issue" perhaps be fixed by changing our number system to something more... powerful?


Let $\operatorname{last}_n a$ denote the number obtained by taking the last $n$ digits of the number $a$ (and $\operatorname{last}_n a = a$ if $a$ has less than $n$ digits). For example, we have $\operatorname{last}_3 14835 = 835$, $\operatorname{last}_4 57 = 57$ and $\operatorname{last}_2 302 = 02 = 2$. We've seen that $\operatorname{last}_n (a+b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a + \operatorname{last}_n b)$ and $\operatorname{last}_n (a\times b) = \operatorname{last}_n(\operatorname{last}_n a \times \operatorname{last}_n b)$ for all $a, b$ and all $n>0$. We'll say that a number system is a powerful number system if additionally we have $$\operatorname{last}_n (a^b) = \operatorname{last}_n((\operatorname{last}_n a)^{\operatorname{last}_n b}).$$

Unfortunately, ordinary base-$B$ positional notation isn't powerful for any $B$ (can you see why?), so we're forced to turn to more exotic systems:

  • The bijective base-$B$ number systems are like ordinary base-$B$ numbers, but instead of the digits going from $0$ to $B-1$, they go from $1$ to $B$ (and zero is represented by the empty string). The most famous instance is unary notation or bijective base-$1$, in which a number is represented by writing that many $1$s in succession. For example, the list of numbers in bijective base-$10$ notation goes like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \mathrm A, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1{\mathrm A}, 21, \ldots$ (where the digit $\mathrm A$ represents ten).

  • The factorial number system is a system which is not tied to any base in particular; instead, it is such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $0$ to $k-1$ (so in theory this base needs infinitely many symbols, but only a finite amount is needed to represent a given number). The list of positive numbers in this notation goes like $0, 10, 100, 110, 200, 210, 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1200, 1210, 2000, 2010, 2100, 2110, 2200, 2210, 3000, 3010, \ldots$. This number system is called as such because the factorial $N! = N \times (N-1) \times \cdots \times 2 \times 1$ of any number $N$ is easily expressed in this notation as an $1$ followed by $N$ zeros. For example, $6!$ is expressed as $1000000$.

  • Finally, we can combine the ideas of the bijective and factorial number systems by defining the bijectorial number system: a system such that the $k$th digit is allowed to vary from $1$ to $k$. The numbers in this notation go like $\text{(empty)}, 1, 11, 21, 111, 121, 211, 221, 311, 321, 1111, \ldots$

Can you find all powerful number systems among the mentioned ones (bijective base-$B$ for some $B$, factorial, bijectorial)?


Hint:

There are finitely many.