Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice work. What is the result of running this? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 16, 2021 at 4:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DmitryKamenetsky Horse A has a 50% chance of winning, while Horses B & C both have a 25% chance of winning. $\endgroup$
    – lala
    Commented Dec 16, 2021 at 4:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This answer makes the extra assumption that the events listed in the problem are independent, which wasn't stated in the question; yet the word "independent" doesn't even appear in this answer. So, you're basing your simulations on an unspoken extra assumption. $\endgroup$
    – Stef
    Commented Dec 16, 2021 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Stef Even worse than assuming "independent". This answer assumes that the events come from a pseudo random number generator ... $\endgroup$
    – WhatsUp
    Commented Dec 18, 2021 at 0:51
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @WhatsUp It's called a simulation, you being able to work out the result in advance by performing a 'hack' to gain knowledge of the seed number makes no difference to the overall outcome of of the result, whether it came from a pseudo random number generator or an actual random number generator. (-‸ლ) $\endgroup$
    – lala
    Commented Dec 20, 2021 at 4:36