Timeline for Prove that π > 3
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
27 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 13, 2022 at 11:24 | answer | added | Przemyslaw Remin | timeline score: 12 | |
Sep 7, 2021 at 19:31 | history | edited | bobble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
image description for accessibility
|
Sep 7, 2021 at 6:07 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Aug 31, 2021 at 5:09 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
Aug 29, 2021 at 21:02 | comment | added | Florian F | Frankly, I didn't know whether that story was real or not. It is a rumor I heard. Take it just as a pretext to introduce the problem. I changed the wording. | |
Aug 29, 2021 at 20:55 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Aug 29, 2021 at 17:01 | comment | added | David Smith | Your comment about legislation is seriously over-generalized. One bill was once introduced to committee in the Indiana Legislature. It went no further. Even Hoosiers have some common sense. | |
Aug 29, 2021 at 15:16 | history | edited | Bass | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Aug 29, 2021 at 11:42 | comment | added | BCLC | Indiana Pi Bill: Other attempts to establish mathematical truth by legislative fiat? | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 22:58 | comment | added | Florian F | Wow. Actually I mentioned Banach-Tarski as a joke. I know it works in 3D. But as it seems, it wasn't that far-fetched. Thanks for sharing. | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 22:45 | comment | added | Victor Stafusa | Florian and @quest - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski%27s_circle-squaring_problem - i.e., Banach-Tarski tricks are possible. | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 10:43 | vote | accept | Florian F | ||
Aug 28, 2021 at 10:28 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
Aug 28, 2021 at 10:04 | answer | added | Bass | timeline score: 134 | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 9:18 | comment | added | Florian F | I also don't see how Banach Tarski could be used here. But if it can, it is not allowed. | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 8:54 | comment | added | quest | I don't see how one can use Banach Tarski in two dimensions. Could you elaborate a solution based on that or do you map the circle to higher dimensions and then map it back to 2D? | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 8:33 | comment | added | quest | I think the first step is to prove that no matter the size of the circle, pi is constant. Or at least that pi>3 no matter the size of the circle. I think you need some kind of measurable argument to prove that pi exists if you define pi via lengths or areas. | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 7:18 | comment | added | Florian F | You can cut every square differently. | |
Aug 28, 2021 at 7:17 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Aug 28, 2021 at 6:01 | history | became hot network question | |||
Aug 27, 2021 at 23:28 | answer | added | loopy walt | timeline score: 67 | |
Aug 27, 2021 at 23:06 | comment | added | bobble | Can you cut the squares differently from each other or do the pieces have to be identical across squares? | |
Aug 27, 2021 at 23:05 | history | edited | bobble |
edited tags
|
|
Aug 27, 2021 at 22:34 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2021 at 22:08 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2021 at 22:03 | history | edited | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2021 at 21:56 | history | asked | Florian F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |