Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ 32 is possible, but not in a real match. The tie break suggest you look for an achievable position. Do you? $\endgroup$
    – Retudin
    Commented May 22, 2021 at 10:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Retudin Yeah, I assumed legal position. Otherwise my guess would be it's too easy, has too many solutions and no tie breaker. $\endgroup$
    – loopy walt
    Commented May 22, 2021 at 10:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Retudin Yes, it must be legal, hence my reasoning for the retrograde analysis tag. $\endgroup$ Commented May 22, 2021 at 18:48