Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 23;11(5):646.
doi: 10.3390/foods11050646.

Nutritional Benefits from Fatty Acids in Organic and Grass-Fed Beef

Affiliations
Review

Nutritional Benefits from Fatty Acids in Organic and Grass-Fed Beef

Hannah Davis et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Livestock production is under increasing scrutiny as a component of the food supply chain with a large impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Amidst growing calls to reduce industrial ruminant production, there is room to consider differences in meat quality and nutritional benefits of organic and/or pasture-based management systems. Access to forage, whether fresh or conserved, is a key influencing factor for meat fatty acid profile, and there is increasing evidence that pasture access is particularly beneficial for meat’s nutritional quality. These composition differences ultimately impact nutrient supply to consumers of conventional, organic and grass-fed meat. For this review, predicted fatty acid supply from three consumption scenarios were modelled: i. average UK population National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) (<128 g/week) red meat consumption, ii. red meat consumption suggested by the UK National Health Service (NHS) (<490 g/week) and iii. red meat consumption suggested by the Eat Lancet Report (<98 g/week). The results indicate average consumers would receive more of the beneficial fatty acids for human health (especially the essential omega-3, alpha-linolenic acid) from pasture-fed beef, produced either organically or conventionally.

Keywords: conventional; fatty acids; nutritional quality; organic; pasture-fed; ruminant nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lang T., Barling D. Nutrition and sustainability: An emerging food policy discourse. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013;72:1–12. doi: 10.1017/S002966511200290X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexandratos N., Bruinsma J. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2012. The 2012 Revision.
    1. Metz B., Davidson O., Bosch P. Climate Change 2007 Mitigation of Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2007.
    1. Gerber P.J., Steinfeld H., Henderson B., Mottet A., Opio C., Dijkman J., Falcucci A., Tempio G. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Rome, Italy: 2013.
    1. Opio C., Gerber P., Mottet A., Falcucci A., Tempio G., MacLeod M., Vellinga T., Henderson B., Steinfeld H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains–A Global Life Cycle Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, Italy: 2013.

LinkOut - more resources