Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 35044672
- DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01636-1
Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: In resistance training, periodization is often used in an attempt to promote development of strength and muscle hypertrophy. However, it remains unclear how resistance training variables are most effectively periodized to maximize gains in strength and muscle hypertrophy.
Objective: The aims of this study were to examine the current body of literature to determine whether there is an effect of periodization of training volume and intensity on maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy, and, if so, to determine how these variables are more effectively periodized to promote increases in strength and muscle hypertrophy, when volume is equated between conditions from pre to post intervention.
Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and SPORTDiscus databases. Data from the individual studies were extracted and coded. Meta-analyses using the inverse-variance random effects model were performed to compare 1-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle hypertrophy outcomes in (a) non-periodized (NP) versus periodized training and (b) in linear periodization (LP) versus undulating periodization (UP). Subgroup analyses examining whether results were affected by training status were performed. Meta-analyses of other periodization model comparisons were not performed, due to a low number of studies.
Results: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Results of the meta-analyses comparing NP and periodized training demonstrated an overall effect on 1RM strength favoring periodized training (ES 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.04, 0.57]; Z = 2.28, P = 0.02). In contrast, muscle hypertrophy did not differ between NP and periodized training (ES 0.13, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.36]; Z = 1.10, P = 0.27). Results of the meta-analyses comparing LP and UP indicated an overall effect on 1RM favoring UP (ES 0.31, 95% CI [0.02, 0.61]; Z = 2.06, P = 0.04). Subgroup analyses indicated an effect on 1RM favoring UP in trained participants (ES 0.61, 95% CI [0.00, 1.22]; Z = 1.97 (P = 0.05)), whereas changes in 1RM did not differ between LP and UP in untrained participants (ES 0.06, 95% CI [-0.20, 0.31]; Z = 0.43 (P = 0.67)). The meta-analyses showed that muscle hypertrophy did not differ between LP and UP (ES 0.05, 95% CI [-0.20, 0.29]; Z = 0.36 (P = 0.72)).
Conclusion: The results suggest that when volume is equated between conditions, periodized resistance training has a greater effect on 1RM strength compared to NP resistance training. Also, UP resulted in greater increases in 1RM compared to LP. However, subgroup analyses revealed that this was only the case for trained and not previously untrained individuals, indicating that trained individuals benefit from daily or weekly undulations in volume and intensity, when the aim is maximal strength. Periodization of volume and intensity does not seem to affect muscle hypertrophy in volume-equated pre-post designs. Based on this, we propose that the effects of periodization on maximal strength may instead be related to the neurophysiological adaptations accompanying resistance training.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2017 Oct;47(10):2083-2100. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28497285 Review.
-
Different Patterns in Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations in Untrained Individuals Undergoing Nonperiodized and Periodized Strength Regimens.J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002482. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 29683914 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26133514 Review.
-
Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Mar;11(2):202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 23. J Sport Health Sci. 2022. PMID: 33497853 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Perspectives in Resistance Training Periodization: Mixed Session vs. Block Periodized Programs in Trained Men.J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Mar 1;37(3):537-545. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004465. Epub 2023 Jan 18. J Strength Cond Res. 2023. PMID: 36727999 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The Importance of Recovery in Resistance Training Microcycle Construction.J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):205-223. doi: 10.5114/jhk/186659. eCollection 2024 Mar. J Hum Kinet. 2024. PMID: 38689583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Resistance Training Reduces Blood Pressure: Putative Molecular Mechanisms.Curr Hypertens Rev. 2024;20(1):52-56. doi: 10.2174/0115734021277791240102041632. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2024. PMID: 38258772 Review.
-
Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Sports Med Open. 2023 Dec 1;9(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00640-1. Sports Med Open. 2023. PMID: 38040927 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Deloading into Strength and Physique Sports Training Programmes: An International Delphi Consensus Approach.Sports Med Open. 2023 Sep 21;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00633-0. Sports Med Open. 2023. PMID: 37730925 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive changes in bodybuilders in conditions of different energy supply modes and intensity of training load regimes using machine and free weight exercises.PeerJ. 2023 Feb 17;11:e14878. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14878. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 36814958 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Maximizing strength development in athletes: a meta-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):377–82. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous