Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 29470825
- DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x
Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Current recommendations on resistance training (RT) frequency for gains in muscular strength are based on extrapolations from limited evidence on the topic, and thus their practical applicability remains questionable.
Objective: To elucidate this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that compared muscular strength outcomes with different RT frequencies.
Methods: To carry out this review, English-language literature searches of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases were conducted. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The meta-analysis models were generated with RT frequencies classified as a categorical variable as either 1, 2, 3, or 4+ times/week, or, if there were insufficient data in subgroup analyses, the training frequencies were categorized as 1, 2, or 3 times/week. Subgroup analyses were performed for potential moderators, including (1) training volume; (2) exercise selection for the 1 repetition maximum (RM) test (for both multi-joint and single-joint exercises); (3) upper and lower body strength gains; (4) training to muscular failure (for studies involving and not involving training to muscular failure); (5) age (for both middle-aged/older adults and young adults); and (6) sex (for men and for women). The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the modified Downs and Black checklist.
Results: A total of 22 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The average score on the Downs and Black checklist was 18 (range 13-22 points). Four studies were classified as being of good methodological quality, while the rest were classified as being of moderate methodological quality. Results of the meta-analysis showed a significant effect (p = 0.003) of RT frequency on muscular strength gains. Effect sizes increased in magnitude from 0.74, 0.82, 0.93, and 1.08 for training 1, 2, 3, and 4+ times per week, respectively. A subgroup analysis of volume-equated studies showed no significant effect (p = 0.421) of RT frequency on muscular strength gains. The subgroup analysis for exercise selection for the 1RM test suggested a significant effect of RT frequency on multi-joint (p < 0.001), but not single-joint, 1RM test results (p = 0.324). The subgroup analysis for upper and lower body showed a significant effect of frequency (p = 0.004) for upper body, but not lower body, strength gains (p = 0.070). In the subgroup analysis for studies in which the training was and was not carried out to muscular failure, no significant effect of RT frequency was found. The subgroup analysis for the age groups suggested a significant effect of training frequency among young adults (p = 0.024), but not among middle-aged and older adults (p = 0.093). Finally, the subgroup analysis for sex indicated a significant effect of RT frequency on strength gains in women (p = 0.030), but not men (p = 0.190).
Conclusions: The results of the present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a significant effect of RT frequency as higher training frequencies are translated into greater muscular strength gains. However, these effects seem to be primarily driven by training volume because when the volume is equated, there was no significant effect of RT frequency on muscular strength gains. Thus, from a practical standpoint, greater training frequencies can be used for additional RT volume, which is then likely to result in greater muscular strength gains. However, it remains unclear whether RT frequency on its own has significant effects on strength gain. It seems that higher RT frequencies result in greater gains in muscular strength on multi-joint exercises in the upper body and in women, and, finally, in contrast to older adults, young individuals seem to respond more positively to greater RT frequencies. More evidence among resistance-trained individuals is needed as most of the current studies were performed in untrained participants.
Similar articles
-
The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2585-2601. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28755103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Weekly Training Frequency Effects on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med Open. 2018 Aug 3;4(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0149-9. Sports Med Open. 2018. PMID: 30076500 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dose-Response Relationships of Resistance Training in Healthy Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1693-720. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0385-9. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26420238 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Mar;11(2):202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 23. J Sport Health Sci. 2022. PMID: 33497853 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1647-1666. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01636-1. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35044672
Cited by
-
Effects of plyometric training on health-related physical fitness in untrained participants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 May 17;14(1):11272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61905-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38760392 Free PMC article.
-
The Importance of Recovery in Resistance Training Microcycle Construction.J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):205-223. doi: 10.5114/jhk/186659. eCollection 2024 Mar. J Hum Kinet. 2024. PMID: 38689583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dose-Response Modelling of Resistance Exercise Across Outcome Domains in Strength and Conditioning: A Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2024 Jun;54(6):1579-1594. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02006-3. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38652410 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of light- vs. heavy-load squat training on velocity, strength, power, and total mechanical work in recreationally trained men and women.Biol Sport. 2024 Mar;41(2):3-11. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.129487. Epub 2023 Sep 21. Biol Sport. 2024. PMID: 38524809 Free PMC article.
-
Resistance Exercise Minimal Dose Strategies for Increasing Muscle Strength in the General Population: an Overview.Sports Med. 2024 May;54(5):1139-1162. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02009-0. Epub 2024 Mar 20. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38509414 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical