International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading
- PMID: 27150257
- DOI: 10.1111/apm.12533
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading
Abstract
The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has issued guidelines for the grading of prostate cancer based on a consensus conference held in 2014. The recommendations resulting from the 2014 consensus conference were a further development of 2005 ISUP modified Gleason grading. In the 2014 system, morphological criteria are clarified, including updated definitions of Gleason pattern 4. In addition to the continued reporting of Gleason scores, we also recommend that Gleason scores ≤6, 3 + 4 = 7, 4 + 3 = 7, 8 and 9-10, respectively, be reported as five groups, i.e. ISUP grades 1-5. This new grading system has the dual benefit of predicting patient outcome as well as facilitating patient communication.
Keywords: Gleason grade; ISUP grade; Prostate cancer; grading.
© 2016 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.Pathology. 2019 Aug;51(5):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Pathology. 2019. PMID: 31279442 Review.
-
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28177964
-
SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Prostate. 2017. PMID: 28144985
-
From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):325-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1201858. Epub 2016 Jul 14. Scand J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27415753 Review.
-
The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315. Pathology. 2015. PMID: 26325670
Cited by
-
Autonomous Tumor Signature Extraction Applied to Spatially Registered Bi-Parametric MRI to Predict Prostate Tumor Aggressiveness: A Pilot Study.Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 10;16(10):1822. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101822. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38791901 Free PMC article.
-
Radiogenomics Map-Based Molecular and Imaging Phenotypical Characterization in Localised Prostate Cancer Using Pre-Biopsy Biparametric MR Imaging.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 15;25(10):5379. doi: 10.3390/ijms25105379. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38791417 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38551559 Free PMC article.
-
Extra-prostatic extension grading system: correlation with MRI features and integration of capsular enhancement sign for "enhanced" detection of T3a lesions.Br J Radiol. 2024 May 7;97(1157):971-979. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae065. Br J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38544291
-
PRADclass: Hybrid Gleason Grade-Informed Computational Strategy Identifies Consensus Biomarker Features Predictive of Aggressive Prostate Adenocarcinoma.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338231222389. doi: 10.1177/15330338231222389. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 38226611 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
