Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;13(12):1139-47.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01028.x. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

Television viewing associated with adverse dietary outcomes in children ages 2-6

C Ford  1 , D Ward, M White
Affiliations
Review

Television viewing associated with adverse dietary outcomes in children ages 2-6

C Ford et al. Obes Rev. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to systematically review the evidence for the association between television viewing and diet in children ages 2-6. Data sources included PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, ERIC, SportDISCUS, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science and hand searches of reference lists of relevant articles. Twelve studies were reviewed in which the relationship between television viewing and diet was assessed in children between the ages of 2 and 6. All but one study reported significant relationship between television viewing time and adverse dietary outcomes. Parent-reported television viewing time was used to assay child television viewing in all included studies. Food frequency survey was the most frequent method of dietary assessment, and parent served as proxies for children in all studies. Lower fruit and/or vegetable intake was the most frequently reported dietary outcome, followed by increased energy intake with increased television viewing. The majority of studies reported adverse dietary outcomes with as little as 1 h of daily television exposure. While these results are consistent with recommendations from child health advocates to limit television viewing in young children, they also suggest that further efforts to limit television viewing in young children may be needed to aid in obesity prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest to report

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of search and results
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Ravussin E. Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1453–6. - PubMed
    1. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378:804–14. - PubMed
    1. Scarborough P, Burg MR, Foster C, et al. Increased energy intake entirely accounts for increase in body weight in women but not in men in the UK between 1986 and 2000. The British journal of nutrition. 2011;105:1399–404. - PubMed
    1. Marcus MD, Wildes JE. Obesity: is it a mental disorder? Int J Eat Disord. 2009;42:739–53. - PubMed
    1. Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annual review of nutrition. 1999;19:41–62. - PubMed

Publication types