Unanswered Questions
22 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
23
votes
0
answers
571
views
Categorical semantics of Agda
I would like to know the state of the art regarding the categorical semantics of the type theory implemented by Agda — or at least some approximation of that type theory that is amenable to ...
13
votes
0
answers
369
views
Unintentionally proven false theorem with type-in-type outside logic and foundations?
We are all familiar with Russell's paradox, and it is known that Per Martin-Löf proved that type-in-type is normalizing and consistent (which is false), by accidentally using an assumption in his meta-...
12
votes
0
answers
169
views
Rules for mutual inductive/coinductive types
Some proof assistants, like Agda and maybe Coq, allow families of mutually defined types, or nested definitions of types, in which some are inductive and others are coinductive. I have no idea what ...
10
votes
0
answers
187
views
Is there a proof assistant (or an embedding) for the (co)end calculus?
A Higher-Order Calculus for Categories describes a system where you can conveniently perform manipulations with categories, functors, Yoneda embeddings etc. An example of the rules is: $$\frac{\Gamma ,...
9
votes
0
answers
309
views
Alternatives to universe levels
All of the type theory based proof assistants that I have seen have an infinite hierarchy of type universes to avoid the type of types being a term of itself. Are there alternative systems which could ...
7
votes
0
answers
106
views
How to improve/understand typechecking performance in Agda?
I've recently been trying to do some basic formalization of category theory in Agda. As part of this I need to prove a bunch of basic properties around products/monoidal categories. A bunch of these ...
7
votes
0
answers
195
views
What was the first proof assistant with eta equality for records?
The Agda language supports eta equality for (non-(co)inductive) record types:
...
6
votes
0
answers
114
views
Is every logical theory embeddable in a dependently typed extensional type theory?
In category theory by the Yoneda embedding every category $\mathcal{C}$ is a subcategory of a category of presheafs $[\mathcal{C}^{\text{op}}, \text{Set}]$. Every category of presheafs is a topos and ...
6
votes
0
answers
232
views
Can Agda proofs be trusted and do they conform to a specific, well-defined type theory?
When using Agda proofs, how can you know whether to trust it? Also, do they conform to a specific, well-defined type theory?
Credit
5
votes
0
answers
246
views
Mere propositions and Consistency with Impredicativity, Excluded Middle and Large Elimination
Setup
Current Understanding
I've recently been trying to learn about the interaction of Impredicative Polymorphism, Large Elimination and Excluded Middle (notably, inconsistency). Notably, this is ...
5
votes
0
answers
168
views
What are the conditions for Agda to detect that induction-recursion has a least fixed point?
This is a 3rd in a series of questions, spurred by my attempts to encode an argument by Danielsson [1] [2] regarding existence of syntactically non-strictly positive datatype.
The idea (rephrased):
...
5
votes
0
answers
95
views
What is the relation of $\lambda^\to$ and $\lambda^{\to\times}$ to cartesian closed categories?
I am learning about the categorical semantics of type theory. I've written some preliminary results in Agda. In particular, I partially proved that the contexts and substitutions of simply-typed ...
4
votes
0
answers
122
views
Proving "proof methods" as theorems in type-theory based proof systems
For example, suppose we have proved associativity of some binary operator $+ : T \to T$ as
add_assoc : forall (x y : T), x + y + z = x + (y + z).
We can thus prove ...
4
votes
0
answers
107
views
Independence of function extensionality
Who first realized that function extensionality cannot be proved within vanilla MLTT, or some variations of it? Now to my knowledge the simplest way to show this is by syntactic models. But surely ...
3
votes
0
answers
113
views
Lower bounds in type theory proof assistant with ordinals and universes without axioms
I saw a PowerPoint that claimed to achieve $\psi_0(\Gamma_{\Omega+1})$ in Agda without any axioms. I was wondering if a better lower bound exists in 2024?
My ...