Skip to main content

Unanswered Questions

17 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
23 votes
0 answers
571 views

Categorical semantics of Agda

I would like to know the state of the art regarding the categorical semantics of the type theory implemented by Agda — or at least some approximation of that type theory that is amenable to ...
12 votes
0 answers
169 views

Rules for mutual inductive/coinductive types

Some proof assistants, like Agda and maybe Coq, allow families of mutually defined types, or nested definitions of types, in which some are inductive and others are coinductive. I have no idea what ...
5 votes
0 answers
168 views

What are the conditions for Agda to detect that induction-recursion has a least fixed point?

This is a 3rd in a series of questions, spurred by my attempts to encode an argument by Danielsson [1] [2] regarding existence of syntactically non-strictly positive datatype. The idea (rephrased): ...
4 votes
0 answers
53 views

Introductory resources on rewriting logic

Hi I would like to grasp the theory behind Maude [1], [2] Are there any recommended video lecture notes, talks or introductory notes? I have been exposed to Functional Analysis, Topology and some Term ...
3 votes
0 answers
129 views

Uniform notions of pattern matching at dependent types with impredicative proof strength

I am looking for axioms/inference rules that satisfy the following 3 conditions: can be added to predicative intensional Martin-Löf type theory, so $\Pi$, $\Sigma$, equality type, with W-types, ...
3 votes
0 answers
93 views

Where is the discriminate tactic defined in Coq?

One can read the Coq documentation about discriminate tactic here. Were is this tactic actually defined?
2 votes
0 answers
65 views

Have Hyperdoctrines been formalized?

I was thinking of formalizing them myself for a project if they haven't been already, and I looked in libraries and couldn't find anything. I was thinking of coq in particular because it's the only ...
2 votes
0 answers
62 views

Elimination rules of inductive types

Why does the elimination rule of inductive types sometimes allow the target type to depend on the inductive type and sometimes not? I am confused by that. Is it correct that it makes no difference in ...
2 votes
0 answers
84 views

Formalization of Analytic Number Theory

Is there any formalization, in any proof checking environment (Lean, Isabelle, etc.) of basic analytic number theory, say everything in a book like the Titchmarsh book (The Theory of the Riemann Zeta ...
1 vote
0 answers
70 views

Heterogeneous lists, large indices

Recently I had cause to define a type of heterogeneous lists in Lean, and wrote ...
1 vote
0 answers
46 views

how to inductively define paths from paths using unimath

I'd like to define a type of graph where given a set of edges, we can define another graph that has everything from graph 1 but extends the set of edges by adding higher level edges to parallel edges(...
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Why does Coq not allow constructor argument types to be strictly positive mutual inductive types?

Note: Apologies for the wicked mouthful of a title. I'm still getting acquainted with Coq terminology, so I might not have chosen the best words. If you have a better title suggestion, edits are more ...
1 vote
0 answers
48 views

Can you always replace mutually recursive references with parameters?

This is a follow up to a question someone else previously posted: Expressivity of mutual/nested inductives vs. regular inductives. pigworker answered that Adopting Agda-ish notation, the basic ...
1 vote
0 answers
180 views

Descriptions of heterogenous datatypes

When attempting to describe the datatype as appearing in my previous question, using indexed descriptions in style of The Gentle Art of Levitation to describe this datatype (using Agda for examples): <...
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Simple and proper methods in Isar

https://isabelle.systems/cookbook/src/proofs/methods/Chained_Facts.thy talks about We note a slight difference. In the variant with intro, a trivial goal remains that we need to solve by ‹assumption›....

15 30 50 per page